POLY-DISCOURSIVITY AS OVERCOMING LINEARITY OF THE TEXT (ON THE MATERIAL OF TNEE. VODOLAZKIN’S NOVEL «LAVR»)

В. В. Мальцева, V. Maltseva

Abstract


The present article deals with the problem of poly-discoursivity in the literary fiction on the material of the E. Vodolazkin’s novel «Lavr». The aims of the research include studying linguistic means of blending different discourses within one context, analyzing the main features of poly-discoursivity and its influence on a narrative structure. It is said that postmodern prose represents a sphere of the poly-discoursivity, which means superimposition and interaction of the various discourses. Intertextuality is shown as a specific form of poly-discoursivity because it can be considered as an insertion of a particular personal discourse into the text. Much attention is given to polysemy of the utterance. This is due to discourse capability to have its own typical picture of the world. It is emphasized that multiplicity of reading is a goal of the postmodern writer. Poly-discoursivity is related to the supra-individual language experience, it can transgresses bounds of linearity of narrative and contributes to the emergence of fractals and metacommunicative acts. As the result, non-linearity of the text and fractality highlight existential, universal semantic level in the text.

Keywords: discourse, poly-discoursivity, intertextuality, non-linearity of the text, fractality.


Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Барт Р. S/Z. / Ролан Барт; [пер. с фр. Г. К. Косикова и В. П. Мурат; под ред. Г. К. Косикова]. – 3-е изд. – М.: Академический проект, 2009 – 373 с.

Водолазкин Е. Лавр. – М.: Астрель, 2013. – 396 с.

Кардашова Е. В. Обыденный дискурс как предмет научного осмысления // Вестник Харьковского национального университета имени В. Н. Каразина. Серия «Филология». – 2015. – №. 1152, вып. 72 – С. 171-176

Коммуникативные стратегии культуры и гуманитарные технологии: Научно-методические материалы; под ред. В. И. Тюпы, Е. В. Родионовой, А. Л. Стародубовой, О. В. Федуниной – СПб.: ООО «Книжный дом», 2007. – 524 с.

Макаров М. Л. Основы теории дискурса. – М.: ИТДГК «Гнозис», 2003. – 280 с.

Теория литературы: в 2 т. Т. 1: Теория художественного дискурса. Теоретическая поэтика: учебное пособие для вузов / Авторы тома Н. Д. Тамарченко, В. И. Тюпа, С. Н. Бройтман. – 2-е изд., испр. – М.: Аcademia, 2007. – 510 с.

Хайдеггер М. Исток художественного творения; [пер. с нем. Михайлова А. В.]. – М.: Академический Проект, 2008. – 528 с. – (Философские технологии: философия).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ulrichs Web

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge

Editorial board is used the principles of ethics of scientific publications upon recommendations of The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

THE LINK AND REFERENCE TO AUTHORS WHEN COPYING OR CITING SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES IS OBLIGATORY

 

http://justclickit.ru/flash/alfa/alfa%20(859).gifTo receive the personal identifier of the author ORCID make registration on the site https://orcid.org/register, receive the digital code and give it to editorial board with the article.