ДИСФУНКЦІОНАЛЬНІСТЬ СУЧАСНИХ ПАРТІЙНИХ СИСТЕМ ЯК ФОРМ ПОЛІТИЧНОГО ПРЕДСТАВНИЦТВА
Анотація
Харківський національний університет імені В.Н. Каразіна Стаття присвячена дослідженню чинників трансформації усталених форм політичного представництва. На основі крос-національних досліджень динаміки дескриптивних (партійне членство, електоральна підтримка) і субстантивних (соціальна база) характеристик політичного представництва виявлено фактори, які спричиняють ерозійні тенденції у представницьких демократіях. Найвпливовішими серед них є структурні зміни соціально-економічних позицій електорату «традиційних» центристських партій, його маргіналізація і формування прекаріатних прошарків населення без чіткої соціополітичної ідентифікації, а також зниження репрезентативної функції партій в умовах де-етатизації і транснаціоналізації політикотворчих процесів.
Ключові слова: політичне представництво, представницька демократія, суспільні інтереси, політичні партії.
Статья посвящена исследованию факторов трансформации устоявшихся форм политического представительства. На основе кросс-национальных исследований динамики дескриптивных (партийное членство, электоральная поддержка) и субстантивных (социальная база) характеристик политического представительства выявлены факторы, вызывающие эрозионные тенденции в представительных демократиях. Наиболее влиятельными среди них являются структурные изменения социально-экономических позиций электората «традиционных» центристских партий, его маргинализация и формирование прекариатних слоев населения без четкой социополитической идентификации, а также снижение репрезентативной функции партий в условиях де-этатизации и транснационализации политикотворческих процессов.
Ключевые слова: политическое представительство, представительная демократия, общественные интересы, политические партии.
The present paper concerns the study of the factors causing trans formation of the established forms of political representation. Based on the analysis of cross-national studies of the dynamics of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of political parties and the level of trust to them and representative bodies, it has been found that, despite high public support for the idea of representative democracy, its actual erosion takes place. Besides, it is accompanied by electoral absenteeism, a confidence decline in centrist parties and their focus on narrower but not wider electoral audience, the destruction of established party systems and the strengthening of the positions of right-wing and left-radical populist political organizations. The main causes of the crisis in the existing mechanisms of political representation are structural changes in social configurations that provided the traditional basis of support for major political parties, the formation of precarious strata because of globalization-technological changes that do not have a clear socio-political identification. Major causes also include the lack of relevant political organizations and the weak response of the «traditional» centrist political forces to the demands of women's representation, the lack of involvement of young people in the party and the representative bodies, and the lack of representation of various social groups. Moreover, all of these groups are becoming even clearer in emphasizing their withdrawal from the state of marginalization. The last but not the least cause is the representative party dysfunctionality in relation to the retranslation of citizens' interests against the background of de-etatisation and the trans-nationalization of policy-making processes.
Keywords: political representation, representative democracy, public interest, political parties.
Повний текст:
PDFПосилання
Центр Разумкова, 2018. Довіра громадян України до суспільних інститутів. [online] Available at: http://razumkov.org.ua/napryamki/sotsiolohichni-doslidzhennia/dovira-hromadian-ukrainy-do-suspilnykh-instytutiv [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Aiko, R. Akinocho, H.and Lekorwe, M., 2016. Job performance of MPs, local council ors: Are representatives serving voters or themselves? [online] Аfrobarometer. Let the people have a say. Available at: http://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/publications/Dispatches/ab_r6_dispatchno115_mp_and_councillor_performance_in_africa.pdf [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Audickas, L., Dempsey, N. and Keen, R., 2018. Member ship of UK Political Parties. [online] House of Commons Library. Available at: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05125 [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Bentley, T., Olapade, M., Wambua, P. and Charron, N., 2017. Where to start? Aligning Sustainable Development Goals with citizen priorities. [online] Аfrobarometer. Let the people have a say. Available at: http://afrobarometer.org/publications/ad67-where-start-aligning-sustainable-development-goals-citizen-priorities [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Diamond, L. and Plattner, М. 2015. Is Democracy in Decline? Johns Hopkins University Press.
Giebler, H., Lacewell, O., Regel, S. and Werner, A. 2018. Decline or Change? Party Types and the Crisis of Representative Democracy. In Democracy and Crisis: Challenges in Turbulent Times, pp. 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72559-8_7
Hartig, H., 2018. Democrats, Republicans give their parties so-so ratings for standing up for «traditional» positions. [online] Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/16/democrats-republicans-give-their-parties-so-so-ratings-for-standing-up-for-traditional-positions/ft_18-05-16_partisansparties_howdemocrats/ [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Hughes, M., Duncanand, B. and Pournik, M., 2014. Women’s Leader ship as a Route to Greater Empowerment: Report on the Diamond Leader ship Model. [online] USAID. Available at : https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1866/Diamond%20Model%20Report.pdf [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Hutte, S., Kriesi, H. and Lorenzini, J., 2016. Social Movements in Interaction with Political Parties. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements [online]. Available at: https://www.google.com.ua/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjVn4eYheDdAhWtiqYKHf7WBn0QFjABegQICBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.swen-hutter.eu%2F1%2F147%2Fresources%2Fnews_1010_1.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2VJiKyWb97JRkqinlzX_QC [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2016. Youth participation in National Parliaments. [online] Available at: https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/reports/2016-07/youth-participation-in-national-parliaments [Accessed 2018].
Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2018. Women in National Parliaments. [online] Available at: http://archive.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Klaukka, G., Van der Staak, S. and Valladares, J., 2017. The changing nature of political parties and representation. The Global Stateof Democracy: Exploring Democracy's Resilience, [online], chapter 4, pp. 98–123, Available at: https://www.idea.int/gsod/ [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Krook, M.L., 2010. Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Political Studies, [online] 58, pp. 886–908. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Latinobarómetro. Opinion Publica Latinoamericana, 2015. La Confianza en América Latina 1995–2015 20 años de Opinion Publica Latinoamericana. [online] Banco de datos en línea. Available at: http://www.latinobarometro.org/latNewsShow.jsp [Accessed 25 August 2018].
Mair, P. 2013. Rulingthe Void. London, New York: Verso.
Mccarthy, J., 2018. Congress and the Public. [online] Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Merkel, W. and Kneip, S. 2018. Democracy and Crisis: Challenges in Turbulent Times. Springer.
O’Neil, Т. and Domingo, P., 2015. The Power to Decide. Women, Decision-making and Gender Equality. [online] ODI Report. Available at: https://www.odi.org/publications/9910-power-decide-women-decision-making-and-gender-equality [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Schmitter, P.C., 2006. A Prolegomenon to a Theory of Interest Politics: Needs, Interests, Concerns, Action and eventually, associability. [online] Central European University. Budapest and European University Institute. Available at: https://www.eui.eu/.../Schmitter/PCSProlegomenonJan06.pdf [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Standard Eurobarometer 89, 2018. Public Opinion in the European Union. First Results. [online] Kantar Public Brussels on behalf of TNS opinion & socia. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/STANDARD/surveyKy/2180 [Accessed 27 August 2018].
The Alternative UK, 2017. New research on the steady decline of political party memberships in Europe. [online] (13 November 2017) Available at: https://www.thealternative.org.uk/dailyalternative/2017/11/14/decline-of-parties-europe [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Thomassen, J.A., C. van Ham, Aarts, K. and Andeweg, R., 2017. Legitimacy Crisis of Representative Democracy? In: C van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts and R. Andeweg, eds. 2017. My thand Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-NationalDifferencesin Established Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch. 1. https://doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198793717.001.0001
Tormey, S. 2014. The Contemporary Crisis of Representative Democracy. Democratic Theory. An Inter disciplinary Journal, 1(2), pp. 104–112. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2014.010211
Van Biezen, I., 2013. The decline in party membership across Europe means that political parties need to reconsider how they engage with the electorate. [online] Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/05/06/decline-in-party-membership-europe-ingrid-van-biezen/ [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Wang, Zh. and You, Y., 2016. The arrival of critical citizens: Decline of political trust and shifting public priorities in China. International Review of Sociology Routledge, [online] 26(1), pp. 105–124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1103054 [Accessed 27 August 2018].
Wang, Zh., 2013. Institutional Trust in East Asia. Global barometer, [online] 92. Available at: http://www.asianbarometer.org/publications/abs-working-paper-series [Accessed 2018].
Weston, C., 2015. The radical right in Britain: the UK Independence Party – a new force in politics or a political oufflé? Вісник Національного технічного університету України «Київський політехнічний інститут» Політологія. Соціологія. Право, 1/2 (25/26), с. 42–50.
Wike, R., Simmons, K., Stokesand, B. and Fetterolf, J. 2017. Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy. But many also end or non democratic alternatives. Pew Research Center. Global Attitudes & Trends, [online]. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/10/16/globally-broad-support-for-representative-and-direct-democracy/ [Accessed 27 August 2018].
WVS, 2015. World Values Survey (2010-2014) Crossings by country Study. [online] Available at: http://dagobah.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/M6-World-Values-Survey-2010-2014-WVS.pdf [Accessed 27 August 2018]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2537746
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.